Roof insurance claims, from the homeowner’s side

What follows is how the process actually runs, in the order it runs in. It is not advice about your policy — nobody can give you that without reading it — and it is not a promise about any outcome. It is the map.

In Ontario the failure that leads is the autumn offshore winds, which find anything already loose, and that shapes what a claim here usually looks like. These winds are not constant, which is the problem. A roof gets nine quiet months and then one night at fifty miles an hour, and whatever was marginal goes.

The sequence, start to finish

The process is: loss, evidence, mitigation, notice, inspection, scope, payment, work, final payment. Insurers are used to it and run it many times a day; the homeowner is doing it for the first and probably only time, and that asymmetry is the real difficulty rather than any individual step being hard.

It helps to think of it as a file being built rather than a decision being made. Everything you send becomes part of the file, and the file is what gets decided on — not the roof.

What to gather, and when

The file you want by the time an adjuster arrives contains: dated photographs from before anything was moved, the receipts for anything you spent making it safe, a copy of your policy declarations page, any prior roof paperwork you have, and a written note of the sequence of events. That is not a burdensome list and assembling it is the highest-value hour you will spend on the whole claim.

Prior paperwork matters more than people expect. If you have the invoice from when the roof was last replaced, it establishes the age of the roof, which is the number the entire depreciation calculation runs on.

Worth having in one folder before the adjuster arrives:

• Any paperwork from when the roof was last replaced or repaired
• Dated photographs taken before anything was moved, cleared or covered
• A dated written note of what happened, when, and who you spoke to
• Photographs of undamaged sections of the same roof, for comparison
• Interior photographs, including the attic and the underside of the deck
• The contractor’s written assessment, if you have had one done
• Your policy declarations page, showing the deductible and the settlement basis

What an adjuster is actually looking for

An adjuster is not deciding whether your roof is old. They are deciding two things: whether the damage was caused by a peril the policy covers, and whether it happened during the policy period. Everything they do on the roof serves those two questions. They will look for a consistent pattern of damage on the slopes facing the weather, for damage to soft metal that corroborates the story, and for signs that the roof was already failing before the event.

The word that decides most claims is "sudden". Damage that is clearly the result of one event is covered; wear, deterioration, poor maintenance and long-term leaks generally are not, and are usually excluded in so many words.

Actual cash value, replacement cost, and the money held back

There are two ways a policy can pay. Replacement cost value pays what it costs to put the roof back today. Actual cash value pays that same figure minus depreciation for the age and condition of the roof — and on a roof two-thirds of the way through its life, depreciation can be most of the money. Which one you have is written on your declarations page, and it is worth knowing before you file rather than after.

This one line in the policy is usually the difference between a claim that pays for a roof and a claim that pays for part of one. It is not negotiable after the fact; it is what you bought.

Storm-chasers, doorstep contracts, and assignment of benefits

Be careful with an assignment of benefits. It transfers your rights under the claim to the contractor, who then deals with the insurer directly and is paid directly. There are legitimate uses for it and it is also the most common way homeowners lose control of their own claim, because once it is signed the decisions stop being yours. Some states restrict or regulate it for exactly this reason. Read anything described as an assignment, a direction to pay, or a contingency agreement very carefully, and take it away to read.

Watch for a contract that binds you to the contractor regardless of what the insurer decides — signed in a hurry after a storm, it can leave you owing money for a job the claim never funded.

Red flags, none of which are subtle:

• Pressure to sign anything today, or a discount that expires this afternoon
• A request for a large payment up front, before materials are delivered or work begins
• Any offer to describe old damage as part of the new event
• A contract that binds you regardless of what the insurer approves
• An offer to waive, absorb, discount or rebate your deductible — this is fraud, and it is the clearest signal there is
• No verifiable local address, or a licence number that does not check out on the state board’s own register

The things that turn a claim into a criminal matter

The straightforward test: does every document the insurer receives describe what actually happened and what was actually paid? If the answer is yes, everything is fine, including being firm and well-documented about a claim you believe is being underpaid. Pressing hard for a fair settlement is legitimate. Misdescribing the loss is not, and the difference is not a matter of degree.

There is nothing wrong with getting the most your policy actually provides. There is a great deal wrong with getting more than it provides, and the gap between those two is the entire subject.

The deductible, and the thing no honest contractor will offer

The deductible comes off every claim payment, and many policies carry a second, larger one that applies only to wind and hail. That one is often written as a percentage of the insured value of the house rather than as a flat sum, which means it can be several times the size of the ordinary deductible. On a house insured for four hundred thousand dollars, a two per cent wind-and-hail deductible is eight thousand dollars, and a great many homeowners discover this at the worst possible moment.

Check the declarations page for both figures before filing. If the likely damage is smaller than the applicable deductible, filing achieves nothing and still puts a claim on your record.

Why the argument is usually about how much of the roof

A partial approval is not a denial, and it is not final either. If your contractor’s scope and the adjuster’s scope differ, the route forward is a written, itemised comparison of the two — line by line, with photographs attached to the lines that differ — sent to the insurer with a request for re-inspection. Insurers revise scopes routinely when given something specific to revise against. They revise nothing in response to a phone call expressing dissatisfaction.

Ask the contractor for their scope in the same format the insurer uses, item by item with quantities. Two documents in the same shape can be compared. A quote that is one number and a paragraph cannot be.

How long all of this takes

Report promptly even if you have not decided what to do about the damage, because the reporting deadline runs from the date of the loss and not from the date you noticed it. Reporting is not the same as committing to a claim, and you can withdraw one that turns out to be below your deductible.

There is also a limit on how long you have to sue if it comes to that, which in many states is considerably shorter for a property insurance policy than for an ordinary contract. If a claim is going badly, that limit is a reason to get proper advice early rather than to keep negotiating indefinitely.

What to do when the answer is no

Most successful challenges are not arguments. They are documents: a written scope, itemised the same way the insurer’s is, with photographs attached to the specific lines in dispute and a clear statement of what is being asked for. Insurers respond to that. They do not respond to dissatisfaction expressed at volume, and the homeowners who do best are almost always the ones who stayed unemotional and specific.

Keep every communication in writing, or follow up every phone call with an email summarising what was said. A claim file that shows what was agreed and when is worth a great deal if the matter goes further.

Making it safe, and getting paid for having done so

Mitigation is not repair, and the distinction matters. Making the roof watertight for a fortnight is mitigation and should be documented as such. Beginning the permanent repair before the adjuster has seen the damage is not mitigation, and it removes the evidence the claim depends on. If circumstances force a permanent repair immediately, photograph everything exhaustively first and tell the insurer why it could not wait.

Keep any material that was removed if it is practical to do so — a bundle of damaged shingles in the garage has settled more than one disagreement about what the roof was like.

What it comes down to

Document first, make it safe second, report third, and get the scope in writing before anybody starts work. In that order it usually goes smoothly. In any other order it usually does not.